imagee of hydrocarbon molecule

Research into renewable fuel sources

reFuel.ch conducts research projects, and case studies and engages with stakeholders to accelerate the production of sustainable fuels for Switzerland.

image of hydrocarbon molecule

Research into
renewable fuel sources

reFuel.ch conducts research projects, and case studies and engages with stakeholders to accelerate the production of sustainable fuels for Switzerland.

image of hydrocarbon molecule
PUBLICATIONS

News, Papers and Factsheets

Find all publications sorted by format.

All
Search here icon
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Research Paper Science of The Total Environment
Papers

Prospective life cycle assessment of cost-effective pathways for achieving the FuelEU Maritime Regulation targets

To reduce environmental impacts from the shipping industry, the FuelEU Maritime Regulation has set a binding 80 % reduction target for well-to-wake (WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. This article presents a prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing the environmental impacts of e-ammonia, e-methanol, e-Fischer Tropsch (FT) diesel, and e-liquefied natural gas (LNG)—for maritime applications in Europe. In addition to e-fuels, traditional propulsion technologies using very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) and LNG are assessed, both with and without integrating ship-based carbon capture (SBCC) systems. Key factors considered include the impact of different production locations in Europe, electrolysis technology choices, and global climate policies. Beyond analysing the environmental footprints, the study examines the economic and externality costs associated with each fuel option, contextualizing these findings within the GHG mitigation targets set by the FuelEU Maritime regulation.The results indicate that e-ammonia, e-FT diesel, and e-methanol could meet the 2050 FuelEU Maritime target, but e-LNG and SBCCS could not. Although it is the most immature technology, e-ammonia could be the cheapest option with the lowest overall environmental impacts. E-LNG shows higher life cycle climate change impacts due to ship-level methane slip but has lower impacts across other environmental categories because of low NOx emissions. E-methanol has higher toxicity risks over the life cycle and higher costs.
January 1, 2025
Research Paper INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Papers

Cost-Effective Locations for Producing Fuels and Chemicals from Carbon Dioxide and Low-Carbon Hydrogen in the Future

This study investigates the cost and climate change mitigation potentials of fuels and chemicals from CO2 and low-carbon hydrogen produced in four sites with favorable conditions for renewable energy generation, located in Iceland, The Netherlands, Spain, and Chile. We investigate eight different chemicals, i.e., Fischer–Tropsch fuels, methanol, methane, dimethyl ether, ammonia, urea, olefins, and aromatics, considering two temporal horizons, i.e., the near future (by 2035) and the long-term future (post-2035). For hydrogen production, we explore alkaline water electrolysis, proton exchange membranes, and solid oxide electrolyzer cells. As carbon feedstock, we focus on CO2 produced via low-temperature solid adsorption direct air capture (LT DAC). Additionally, we investigate CO2 from high-temperature aqueous absorption DAC and point-source capture. We find that optimal renewable energy sites like the ones considered in this study have the potential to offer competitive costs for carbon capture and utilization (CCU) processes. These routes, when compared to the current price of their fossil-based counterparts, could achieve long-term future cost ratios ranging from 1 to 6.5 times, with a cost per ton of CO2eq avoided estimated between 150 and 750 €/t. In conclusion, this research provides valuable insights into the techno-economic feasibility of relying on fuels and chemicals via CCU processes as an energy policy strategy.
July 29, 2024