10 questions concerning the design of urban energy systems

This study examines ten critical questions that define current challenges, methodologies, and future priorities in UES design.
September 1, 2025
10 questions concerning the design of urban energy systems

Urban energy systems (UES) design must adapt to the multifaceted challenges of an evolving global energy landscape. This study examines ten critical questions that define current challenges, methodologies, and future priorities in UES design, providing a comprehensive understanding of techno-economic and socio-institutional aspects. It first examines the lateral and vertical interactions across spatial scales, sectors, and time, as well as the evolving needs in heating, cooling, transportation, and renewable integration. Consequently, the study critically assesses the capabilities and limitations of current energy system modeling practices, highlighting challenges related to data requirements, system complexity, scalability, and uncertainty analysis. It then discusses building energy demand and building stock modeling to provide high-resolution analyses of decarbonization pathways and to support effective demand-side management and storage solutions. As these approaches require data, the role of data availability and governance in UES design through the integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence is reviewed. Moreover, it is important to consider dimensions beyond digital tools. The study discusses the inclusion of broader environmental dimensions beyond greenhouse gas emissions into UES planning to ensure sustainable pathways. It also emphasizes the role of governance, policy, business models, and social engagement in successful deployment of UES. Finally, this study analyzes how UES design can enable emerging urban visions and address the unique challenges faced by low- and middle-income countries in the Global South. By answering the ten most relevant questions on UES design, this paper aims to examine the future priorities of UES design and to offer actionable solutions for creating more resilient, fair, and sustainable urban energy futures.

‍

Read the full paper online:

Ten questions concerning the design of urban energy systems.

B. Koirala, A. Bendiek-Laranjo, M. Biéron, Y.C. Chen, G. Humbert, J. Hunhevicz, R. Mutschler, M. Obrist, E. Romano, N. Vulic, M. Yazdanie, G. Mavromatidis

Building and Environment
2025

‍DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113348

Share this post
PUBLICATIONS

Latest findings from research

Research Paper Energy & Environmental Science
Papers

Haber–Bosch 2.0 for low-carbon ammonia production: a global techno-economic and environmental assessment

Decentralized ammonia production via electric Haber–Bosch (Haber–Bosch 2.0) could support shipping, chemical manufacturing, and local fertilizer supply chains. Unlike conventional Haber–Bosch systems, Haber–Bosch 2.0 technologies operate at lower pressures (∼30–60 bar) and temperatures (∼400 °C), enabling smaller, modular ammonia systems powered by low-carbon electricity. However, its economic viability and environmental performance under diverse conditions remain unclear. Here, we apply techno-economic and environmental life cycle assessment using a novel, open-source framework to optimally design ∼13 000 grid-connected, hybrid, and off-grid electric Haber–Bosch configurations worldwide. Our results demonstrate that decentralized ammonia production costs are between €740–4100 tNH3−1, which is substantially higher compared to centralized ammonia production (∼300 tNH3−1 historically with recent spikes up to ∼€800 tNH3−1). Hybrid configurations exhibit the lowest costs (€740–2090 tNH3−1), particularly in regions with low grid electricity prices, low capital costs, and/or abundant renewables. However, their GHG emissions vary widely depending on the GHG intensity of the local grid. Off-grid systems exhibit the lowest life cycle GHG emissions (on average 0.70 tCO2-eq. tNH3−1), but demonstrate high costs (more than €1100 tNH3−1), driven by oversized renewables and energy storage media to enable continuous Haber–Bosch operation. Cost parity may be achieved by 2050 through technology learning, especially for hybrid systems (€325 tNH3−1). To realize this potential and secure low-carbon fertilizer supply, policymakers should; (1) accelerate the decarbonization of national power grids, (2) provide early-stage deployment support for flexible, electric Haber–Bosch technologies, and (3) establish clear certification standards for low-carbon ammonia.
October 9, 2026